Reading Comprehension Questions with Solution (Test 1)

Preparing for Reading Comprehension (Test 1)

Take our Reading Comprehension Questions (Test 1) and improve your skills.

1 / 10

Instruction for 1 to 6:

The narrative of Dersu Uzala is divided into two major sections, set in 1902, and  1907, that deal with separate expeditions which Arseniev conducts into the  Ussuri region. In addition, a third time frame forms a prologue to the film. Each  of the temporal frames has a different focus, and by shifting them Kurosawa is  able to describe the encroachment of settlements upon the wilderness and the consequent erosion of Dersu’s way of life. As the film opens, that erosion has  already begun. The first image is a long shot of a huge forest, the trees piled  upon one another by the effects of the telephoto lens so that the landscape  becomes an abstraction and appears like a huge curtain of green. A title  informs us that the year is 1910. This is as late into the century as Kurosawa will  go. After this prologue, the events of the film will transpire even farther back in  time and will be presented as Arseniev’s recollections. The character of Dersu  Uzala is the heart of the film, his life is the example that Kurosawa wishes to  affirm. Yet the formal organization of the film works to contain, to close, to  circumscribe that life by erecting a series of obstacles around it. The film itself is circular, opening and closing with Dersu’s grave, thus sealing off the character  from the modern world to which Kurosawa once so desperately wanted to  speak. The multiple time frames also work to maintain a separation between  Dersu and the contemporary world. We must go back further even than 1910  to discover who he was. But this narrative structure has yet another  implication. It safeguards Dersu’s example, inoculates it from contamination  with history, and protects it from contact with the industrialized, urban world.  Time is organized by the narrative into a series of barriers, which enclose Dersu  in a kind of vacuum chamber, protecting him from the social and historical  dialectics that destroyed the other Kurosawa heroes. Within the film, Dersu  does die, but the narrative structure attempts to immortalize him and his  example, as Dersu passes from history into myth. We see all this at work in the  enormously evocative prologue. The camera tilts down to reveal felled trees  littering the landscape and an abundance of construction. Roads and houses  outline the settlement that is being built. Kurosawa cuts to a medium shot of  Arseniev standing in the midst of the clearing, looking uncomfortable and  disoriented. A man passing in a wagon asks him what he is doing, and the  explorer says he is looking for a grave. The driver replies that no one has died  here, the settlement is too recent. These words enunciate the temporal  rupture that the film studies. It is the beginning of things (industrial society)  and the end of things (the forest), the commencement of one world so young  that no one has had time yet to die and the eclipse of another, in which Dersu  had died. It is his grave for which the explorer searches. His passing symbolises  the new order, the development that now surrounds Arseniev. The explorer  says he buried his friend three years ago next to huge cedar and fir trees, but  now they are all gone. The man on the wagon replies they were probably  chopped down when the settlement was built, and he drives off. Arseniev  walks to a barren, treeless spot next to a pile of bricks. As he moves, the  camera tracks and pans to follow, revealing a line of freshly built houses and a  woman hanging her laundry to dry. A distant train whistle is heard, and the  sounds of construction in the clearing vie with the cries of birds and the rustle  of wind in the trees. Arseniev pauses, looks around for the grave that once was,  and murmurs desolately, ‘Dersu’. The image now cuts farther into the past, to  1902, and the first section of the film commences, which describes Arseniev’s  meeting with Dersu and their friendship. Kurosawa defines the world of the  film initially upon a void, a missing presence. The grave is gone, brushed aside  by a world rushing into modernism, and now the hunter exists only in  Arseniev’s memories. The hallucinatory dreams and visions of Dodeskaden are  succeeded by nostalgic, melancholy ruminations. Yet by exploring these  ruminations, the film celebrates the timelessness of Dersu’s wisdom. The first  section of the film has two purposes: to describe the magnificence and in  human vastness of nature and to delineate the code of ethics by which Dersu  lives and which permits him to survive in these conditions. When Dersu first  appears, the other soldiers treat him with condescension and laughter, but  Arseniev watches him closely and does not share their derisive response.  Unlike them, he is capable of immediately grasping Dersu’s extraordinary  qualities. In camp, Kurosawa frames Arseniev by himself, sitting on the other  side of the fire from his soldiers. While they sleep or joke among themselves,  he writes in his diary and Kurosawa cuts in several point-of-view shots from his  perspective of trees that appear animated and sinister as the firelight dances  across their gnarled, leafless outlines. This reflective dimension, this sensitivity  to the spirituality of nature, distinguishes him from the others and forms the  basis of his receptivity to Dersu and their friendship. It makes him a fit pupil for the hunter.

Q1. According to the author, the section of the film following the prologue.  

2 / 10

Q2. Arseniev’s search for Dersu's grave.

3 / 10

Q3. In the film, Kurosawa hints at Arseniev's reflective and sensitive nature 

(a) by showing him as not being derisive towards Dersu, unlike other soldiers.

(b) by showing him as being aloof from other soldiers.

(c) through shots of Arseniev writing his diary, framed by trees.

(d) All of these

4 / 10

Q4. The film celebrates Dersu's wisdom .

5 / 10

Q5. How is Kurosawa able to show the erosion of Dersu’s way of life?

6 / 10

Q6. According to the author, which of these statements about the film is  correct? 

 

7 / 10

Instruction for 7 to 10:

Billie Holiday died a few weeks ago. I have been unable until now to write  about her, but since she will survive many who receive longer obituaries, a  short delay in one small appreciation will not harm her or us. When she died  we — the musicians, critics, all who were ever transfixed by the most heart rending voice of the past generation — grieved bitterly. There was no reason  to. Few people pursued self-destruction more whole-heartedly than she, and  when the pursuit was at an end, at the age of 44, she had turned herself into a  physical and artistic wreck. Some of us tried gallantly to pretend otherwise,  taking comfort in the occasional moments when she still sounded like a  ravaged echo of her greatness. Others had not even the heart to see and listen  anymore. We preferred to stay home and, if old and lucky enough to own the  incomparable records of her heyday from 1937 to 1946, many of which are not  even available on British LP, to recreate those coarse-textured, sinuous, sensual  and unbearable sad noises which gave her a sure corner of immortality. Her  physical death called, if anything, for relief rather than sorrow. What sort of  middle age would she have faced without the voice to earn money for her  drinks and fixes, without the looks — and in her day she was hauntingly  beautiful — to attract the men she needed, without business sense, without  anything but the disinterested worship of aging men who had heard and seen  her in her glory?  

And yet, irrational though it is, our grief expressed Billie Holiday’s art, that of a  woman for whom one must be sorry. The great blues singers, to whom she may  be justly compared, played their game from strength. Lionesses, though often  wounded or at bay (did not Bessie Smith call herself ‘a tiger, ready to jump’?),  their tragic equivalents were Cleopatra and Phaedra; Holiday was an embittered Ophelia. She was the Puccini heroine among blues singers, or  rather among jazz singers, for though she sang a cabaret version of the blues  incomparably, her natural idiom was the pop song. Her unique achievement  was to have twisted this into a genuine expression of the major passions by  means of a total disregard of its sugary tunes, or indeed of any tune other than  her own few delicately crying elongated notes, phrased like Bessie Smith or  Louis Armstrong in sackcloth, sung in a thin, gritty, haunting voice whose  natural mood was an unresigned and voluptuous welcome for the pains of  love. Nobody has sung or will sing, Bess’s songs from Porgy as she did. It was  this combination of bitterness and physical submission, as of someone lying still  while watching his legs being amputated, which gives such a blood-curdling  quality to her Strange Fruit, the anti-lynching poem that she turned into an  unforgettable art song. Suffering was her profession, but she did not accept it. 

Little need be said about her horrifying life, which she described with  emotional, though hardly with factual, truth in her autobiography Lady Sings  the Blues. After an adolescence in which self-respect was measured by a girl’s  insistence on picking up the coins thrown to her by clients with her hands, she  was plainly beyond help. She did not lack it, for she had the flair and  scrupulous honesty of John Hammond to launch her, the best musicians of the  1930s to accompany her — notably Teddy Wilson, Frankie Newton and Lester Young — the boundless devotion of all serious connoisseurs, and much public  success. It was too late to arrest a career of systematic embittered self immolation. To be born with both beauty and self-respect in the Negro ghetto  of Baltimore in 1915 was too much of a handicap, even without rape at the age  of 10 and drug addiction in her teens. But, while she destroyed herself, she  sang, unmelodious, profound, and heartbreaking. It is impossible not to weep  for her, or not to hate the world which made her what she was. 

Q7. Why will Billie Holiday survive many who receive longer obituaries?

8 / 10

Q8. According to the author, if Billie Holiday had not died in her middle age.

9 / 10

Q9. Which of the following statements is not representative of the author’s  opinion? 

10 / 10

Q10. According to the passage, Billie Holiday was fortunate in all but one of  which of the following ways?

Your score is

The average score is 45%

0%

Our Address

AMS Learning Systems Private Limited

A 25/4, First Floor, Middle Circle, Connaught Place, New Delhi 110001. (Delhi Office)

Quoin Academy, 305, Rajdarshan SOC, Dada Patil Wadi,  Behind ICICI ATM, Thane West. (Mumbai Office)

Contact Us

Email :info@mindworkzz.in

CALL US :  Admissions –

9595806833

Helpline – 9415333920/ 8376996801